
This film has garnered virtually universal great reviews and is one of the leading Oscar contenders. It is beautifully shot, superbly acted - Tommy Lee Jones, Woody Harrelson and Kelly MacDonald are all excellent - and has the greatest haircut you've seen in a film for years. But...
I seem to be in the minority who like this film, think it has lots of fantastic components, but just feel it is a long way short of the master piece everyone else thinks it is. It is definitely not a bad film; it will deservedly win several Oscars (though overlooking Kelly MacDonald for a Best Supporting Actress nomination is almost scandalous) and apparently is a very faithful adaptation of the book. But for me it is a case of the sum being less than the parts.
Should you see it? Yes. Should you herald it as a masterpiece? I have my doubts - in short I preferred Fargo.
2 comments:
watch it again! it reveals more second time around, especially the end - best movie in many years for me bj
You're probably right. It is a great movie - just don't agree it is the flawless masterpiece that everyone says it is. From recent films I still prefer The Lives of Others - simply brilliant. Hey, with Juno, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, and There Will Be Blood all released soon - it may not even be the best film of the spring... ;o)
Post a Comment